ArchiveReader 00205
ArchiveReader 00205
@research-00205

ArchiveReader 00205 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-30078

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 21 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 87 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · documentation exercise Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference r...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-27665

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-26545

Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itself a demonstration of clinical efficacy, sterility or suitability for human use...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-25368

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 12 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-refere...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 27 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Public...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-21394

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 1 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginni...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 31 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 35 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-met...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-16582

Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrie...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-15512

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Record the original units and axis transforma...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 22 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Disc...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2