MethodsReader 00181 · Member profile

Case 14 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with...

Case 19 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sou...

Case 84 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · documentation exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, two...

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” belongs...

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

Case 8 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the...

Case 23 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

Case 41 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

Case 27 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...

Case 31 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: dist...

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.