UnitsCheck 00179
UnitsCheck 00179
@research-00179

UnitsCheck 00179 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 84 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · documentation exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two perc...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-27658

Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…”; the related...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-26538

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inte...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-25364

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 8 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whe...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 23 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-21391

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 41 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 27 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, tw...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 31 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: r...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-16576

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-15508

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 18 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Repor...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-13135

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-11752

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2