StudyDesign 00166
StudyDesign 00166
@research-00166

StudyDesign 00166 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 82 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · documentation exercise Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguo...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-27655

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26535

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-25359

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Locate the primary study and conf...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 6 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument,...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 21 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavaila...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-21387

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 39 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ret...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 25 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambigu...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 29 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference range...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-16571

Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answer addresses “List materials, measurement conditions, controls an...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-15505

Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage incomplete. Add a dated update if verifiable primary material later resolves th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 16 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Lin...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-13133

Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a qualified…”...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-11747

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2