MethodsReader 00121
MethodsReader 00121
@research-00121

MethodsReader 00121 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 14 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 78 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · documentation exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-27645

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-26524

Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: distinguish the discussion point “Use separate entries for the internal tra...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-25346

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24036

Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer addresses “Statistical significance alone does not establish…”; ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 15 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-21377

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 33 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 19 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original repor...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 23 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 33 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-15500

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2