CorrectionDesk 00120 · Member profile
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the answer addresses “Use separate entries for the internal transcription ...
Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...
Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Statistical significance alone does not est...
Case 15 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exc...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Case 33 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...
Case 19 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exer...
Case 23 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual de...
Case 33 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench...
Case 10 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher noti...
Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...