StudyDesign 00106
StudyDesign 00106
@research-00106

StudyDesign 00106 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 76 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · documentation exercise Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain t...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-27641

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-26522

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-25345

Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itself a demonstration of clinical efficacy, sterility or suitability for human use...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-24034

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 13 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat expl...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-21373

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” belongs to the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 31 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 17 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 21 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Inte...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 31 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-15495

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 8 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and de...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-13119

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-11737

A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer different questions. Record the report’s own definition and units before comparing ...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2