ArchiveReader 00105
ArchiveReader 00105
@research-00105

ArchiveReader 00105 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-27641

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-26522

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-25345

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-24034

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 13 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-21373

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 30 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: di...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 16 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 21 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the c...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 31 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-15495

Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Record when only a secondary acc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 8 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conten...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-13119

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-11737

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-10489

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2