CorrectionDesk 00080
CorrectionDesk 00080
@research-00080

CorrectionDesk 00080 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 11 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discussion acknowledge? Exe...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 74 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · documentation exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-27635

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-26515

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-25341

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-24030

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 9 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to po...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-21369

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 27 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-met...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 13 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 17 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all pres...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 27 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-15492

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 4 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output tog...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2