MethodsReader 00051
MethodsReader 00051
@research-00051

MethodsReader 00051 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-25332

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-24021

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” is an excerpt ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 5 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point be...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 23 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not ide...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 9 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and reta...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 13 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 23 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itsel...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-15482

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-14393

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-13111

Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11733

Case 37 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-10479

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-09423

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2