UnitsCheck 00049 · Member profile
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...
Case 8 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailab...
Case 70 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · comparison exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ...
Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the answer addresses “Put the species or model, design, comparator...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...
Case 5 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? E...
Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...
Case 22 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...
Case 8 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report s...
Case 13 — A correction log for an archive article A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repair...
Case 23 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer diffe...
Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...