SourceIndex 00047
SourceIndex 00047
@research-00047

SourceIndex 00047 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 9 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-30064

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 8 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 70 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertain...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-27627

Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: retain the wording beginning “Put the species or model, design, ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-26505

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-25331

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-24021

Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 4 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-21359

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 22 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 8 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, pote...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 12 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 23 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measur...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-15482

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2