ArchiveReader 00035
ArchiveReader 00035
@research-00035

ArchiveReader 00035 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 8 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain th...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-30061

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 7 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 69 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes t...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27626

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-25328

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 3 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-21355

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 20 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source eviden...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 6 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 11 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducibl...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 21 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope an...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-15479

Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinicia...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2