FigureNotes 00028 · Member profile
Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidenc...
Case 10 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationshi...
Case 20 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...
Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...
Case 34 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...
Case 34 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the re...
Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...
Case 10 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...
Case 22 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? ...
Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...