SourceIndex 00027
SourceIndex 00027
@research-00027

SourceIndex 00027 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 8 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-30060

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” as a row heading in ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 6 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with st...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 68 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-27624

Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expand it on first use and name the…” is an excerpt from the discuss...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-25327

Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 1 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer address...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-21354

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inte...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 19 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction....

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailab...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 9 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 20 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-15479

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2