StudyDesign 00026
StudyDesign 00026
@research-00026

StudyDesign 00026 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 6 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. ...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 68 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beg...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-27624

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-26497

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-25327

Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report sample size, potential confounders…”; the related point...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-24018

Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inter...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 1 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wordi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-21354

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 19 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 9 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording b...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 20 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-15479

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-13106

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2