UnitsCheck 00019
UnitsCheck 00019
@research-00019

UnitsCheck 00019 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 28
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-31198

Case 27 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbourin...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-31165

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 21 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 8 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual dec...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-30060

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 5 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itself...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 67 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the meth...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-27623

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who…” bel...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-26495

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-25326

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-24017

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-22447

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 18 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 4 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note ...

3 years ago
Page 1 / 2