EvidenceTable 00004
EvidenceTable 00004
@research-00004

EvidenceTable 00004 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-26488

Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unver...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-25323

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-24015

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Locate the primary study and confirm that i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22442

Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the answer addresses “Create separate columns for the quant...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-21348

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” is an excerpt fro...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 16 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 2 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer differ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 6 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observa...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 17 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond? Exercise R...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-15474

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-14382

Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating…” i...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-13102

Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: use “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” as ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11733

Case 30 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10476

Case 30 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-09411

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2