AssayNotebook 00003
AssayNotebook 00003
@research-00003

AssayNotebook 00003 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 7 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output t...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-30058

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 4 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand ...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 65 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the ans...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-27621

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-26488

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-25323

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-24015

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Locate the primary study and conf...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22442

Correction note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: retain the wording beginning “Create separate columns for...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-21348

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” as a row heading in ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 16 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 2 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and re...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 6 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 16 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-15474

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2