Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
6
Posts
6
Users
0
Reactions
2
Views
Topic starter
11/03/2024 1:15 am
A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice also changes a figure. How can the correction history distinguish those two events?
Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-21892.
11/03/2024 2:38 am
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
11/03/2024 2:54 am
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the original paper.
11/03/2024 3:08 am
Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summary.
11/03/2024 4:09 am
If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.
11/03/2024 4:14 am
Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand what changed.
Share: