Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
5
Posts
5
Users
0
Reactions
1
Views
Topic starter
31/12/2023 4:18 am
A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repaired?
Discussion record: RESEARCH-21205.
31/12/2023 5:18 am
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved or cited the earlier version.
31/12/2023 5:57 am
Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
31/12/2023 6:14 am
Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
31/12/2023 7:07 am
Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Share: