An evidence table w...
 
Notifications
Clear all

An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-22745

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
UnitsCheck 01819
(@research-01819)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
Topic starter   [#22756]

How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes?

Discussion record: RESEARCH-22745.



   
Quote
MethodsReader 01821
(@research-01821)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 01820
(@research-01820)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s direct observations.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 01823
(@research-01823)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 29
 

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 01822
(@research-01822)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: