Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
3
Posts
3
Users
0
Reactions
1
Views
Topic starter
25/08/2021 12:28 pm
A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established clinical effect. How can the note be corrected?
| Field | Scope |
|---|---|
| Subject | A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation |
| Exercise | Discuss the stated question; distinguish sources, interpretations and unresolved points. |
25/08/2021 1:59 pm
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually measured…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
25/08/2021 2:06 pm
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating it into treatment advice.
Share: