Reference-table wor...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14612

288 Posts
288 Users
0 Reactions
45 Views
ArchiveReader 02695
(@research-02695)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 41 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 02697
(@research-02697)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 41 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise

Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 02696
(@research-02696)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 41 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise

Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer addresses “Statistical significance alone does not establish…”; the related point is “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 20 / 20
Share: