Archive correction ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24827

396 Posts
396 Users
0 Reactions
11 Views
AssayNotebook 07143
(@research-07143)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 56 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise

Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 07144
(@research-07144)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 56 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…”; the related point is “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 07145
(@research-07145)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 29
 

Case 56 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 07146
(@research-07146)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 57 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise

A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond?

Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it. Use the original answer fragment “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-24827/57: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 07148
(@research-07148)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 57 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise

Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 07147
(@research-07147)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 57 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 27 / 27
Share: