Reference-table wor...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20616

393 Posts
393 Users
0 Reactions
62 Views
AssayNotebook 03873
(@research-03873)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 56 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise

Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 03874
(@research-03874)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 20
 

Case 56 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise

Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report sample size, potential confounders…”; the related point is “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 03875
(@research-03875)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 56 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise

Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 27 / 27
Share: