Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
375
Posts
375
Users
0
Reactions
26
Views
26/11/2020 8:53 pm
Case 52 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise
Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
26/11/2020 9:46 pm
Case 52 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise
Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
26/11/2020 10:12 pm
Case 52 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise
Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
26/11/2020 10:17 pm
Case 52 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise
Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”; the related point is “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
26/11/2020 10:42 pm
Case 52 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise
Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
26/11/2020 11:41 pm
Case 53 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformation notes. What should accompany it?
Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it. Use the original answer fragment “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-10122/53: address this question within its stated limits.
26/11/2020 11:47 pm
Case 53 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: use “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
26/11/2020 11:50 pm
Case 53 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
27/11/2020 12:19 am
Case 53 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
27/11/2020 1:05 am
Case 53 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
27/11/2020 1:57 am
Case 53 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the answer addresses “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…”; the related point is “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
27/11/2020 2:22 am
Case 54 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise
A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropriate response?
Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it. Use the original answer fragment “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-10122/54: address this question within its stated limits.
27/11/2020 2:29 am
Case 53 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
27/11/2020 3:37 am
Case 54 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
27/11/2020 3:46 am
Case 54 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise
Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
Page 25 / 25
Prev
Share: