Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
3
Posts
3
Users
0
Reactions
2
Views
Topic starter
26/05/2025 12:02 pm
A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing?
Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-26196.
26/05/2025 1:15 pm
Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practical or clinical importance.
26/05/2025 2:02 pm
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Share: