Preprint versus pee...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-14698

17 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
ArchiveReader 03315
(@research-03315)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 03316
(@research-03316)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: