Preprint versus pee...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-20698

18 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
UnitsCheck 04509
(@research-04509)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 04510
(@research-04510)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 04511
(@research-04511)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: