Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
4
Posts
4
Users
0
Reactions
1
Views
Topic starter
16/08/2019 4:08 am
How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes?
Discussion record: RESEARCH-05633.
16/08/2019 4:53 am
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s direct observations.
16/08/2019 5:55 am
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
16/08/2019 6:32 am
Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Share: