An evidence table w...
 
Notifications
Clear all

An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-19553

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
CorrectionDesk 04600
(@research-04600)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
Topic starter   [#19564]

How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes?

Discussion record: RESEARCH-19553.



   
Quote
CitationNotes 04602
(@research-04602)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 04601
(@research-04601)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s direct observations.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 04603
(@research-04603)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 04604
(@research-04604)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: