A durable glossary ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-13224

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
CitationNotes 00912
(@research-00912)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
Topic starter   [#13235]

The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archive prevent confusion?

Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-13224.



   
Quote
AssayNotebook 00913
(@research-00913)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every historical article uses the current convention.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 00914
(@research-00914)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 00915
(@research-00915)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: