A durable glossary ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-15024

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
SourceIndex 05547
(@research-05547)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
Topic starter   [#15035]

The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archive prevent confusion?

Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-15024.



   
Quote
FigureNotes 05548
(@research-05548)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 30
 

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every historical article uses the current convention.



   
ReplyQuote
UnitsCheck 05549
(@research-05549)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 05550
(@research-05550)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: