Reference-table wor...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11028

385 Posts
385 Users
0 Reactions
34 Views
CitationNotes 04572
(@research-04572)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise

Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 04573
(@research-04573)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise

Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…”; the related point is “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 04574
(@research-04574)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 04576
(@research-04576)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 27 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 04575
(@research-04575)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 27 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise

An animal experiment is cited as though it establishes a human outcome. What qualification is required?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-11028/27: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 04577
(@research-04577)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 21
 

Case 27 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise

Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 04578
(@research-04578)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 27 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise

Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 04580
(@research-04580)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 27 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise

Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the answer addresses “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…”; the related point is “Describe the species, model and…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
UnitsCheck 04579
(@research-04579)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 31
 

Case 27 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise

Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginning “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 04581
(@research-04581)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 27 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise

Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: distinguish the discussion point “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 04582
(@research-04582)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise

A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the evidence chain be checked?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-11028/28: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 04583
(@research-04583)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 04585
(@research-04585)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 04584
(@research-04584)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 04586
(@research-04586)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 13 / 26
Share: