Notifications
Clear all
Lab work & testing
262
Posts
262
Users
0
Reactions
18
Views
15/05/2018 6:34 pm
Case 24 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion
Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
15/05/2018 7:02 pm
Case 24 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion
Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
15/05/2018 7:40 pm
Case 24 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion
Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain the wording beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
15/05/2018 7:45 pm
Case 24 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion
Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answer addresses “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough…”; the related point is “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
15/05/2018 8:47 pm
Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise
A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-01140/25: address this question within its stated limits.
15/05/2018 9:01 pm
Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
15/05/2018 9:26 pm
Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise
Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
15/05/2018 10:28 pm
Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise
Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
15/05/2018 10:42 pm
Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
15/05/2018 11:35 pm
Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise
Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer addresses “Statistical significance alone does not establish…”; the related point is “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
15/05/2018 11:55 pm
Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
16/05/2018 12:01 am
Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise
A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repaired?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-01140/26: address this question within its stated limits.
16/05/2018 12:23 am
Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise
Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
16/05/2018 12:58 am
Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise
Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
16/05/2018 1:32 am
Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
Share: