Selection bias in a...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-21616

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
ArchiveReader 02045
(@research-02045)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 30
Topic starter   [#21627]

A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations belong in the note?

Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-21616.



   
Quote
StudyDesign 02046
(@research-02046)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot establish population-level rates.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 02047
(@research-02047)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: