Notifications
Clear all
Lab work & testing
4
Posts
4
Users
0
Reactions
0
Views
Topic starter
27/03/2025 7:10 am
A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond?
Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.
27/03/2025 8:17 am
Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation looking like unqualified current support.
27/03/2025 9:00 am
Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
27/03/2025 9:01 am
Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Share: