Exploratory subgrou...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-11828

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
CitationNotes 00522
(@research-00522)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
Topic starter   [#11839]

A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised?

Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-11828.



   
Quote
AssayNotebook 00523
(@research-00523)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as established guidance.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 00524
(@research-00524)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: