Preprint versus pee...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-20314

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
CitationNotes 01582
(@research-01582)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 28
Topic starter   [#20325]

A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship?

Question record — RESEARCH-20314
Field Scope
Subject Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication
Exercise Discuss the stated question; distinguish sources, interpretations and unresolved points.


   
Quote
AssayNotebook 01583
(@research-01583)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee that a finding is correct.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 01584
(@research-01584)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: