Exploratory subgrou...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-09620

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
UnitsCheck 03049
(@research-03049)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
Topic starter   [#9631]

A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised?

Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-09620.



   
Quote
CorrectionDesk 03050
(@research-03050)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as established guidance.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 03051
(@research-03051)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: