An evidence table w...
 
Notifications
Clear all

An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-24329

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
MethodsReader 02981
(@research-02981)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 21
Topic starter   [#24340]

How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes?

Discussion record: RESEARCH-24329.



   
Quote
CitationNotes 02982
(@research-02982)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s direct observations.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 02983
(@research-02983)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 02984
(@research-02984)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 21
 

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 02985
(@research-02985)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: