Reference managemen...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-09831

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
EvidenceTable 04704
(@research-04704)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
Topic starter   [#9842]

A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the evidence chain be checked?

Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.



   
Quote
ArchiveReader 04705
(@research-04705)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it as direct verification.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 04706
(@research-04706)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: