Reference managemen...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-03831

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
AssayNotebook 09493
(@research-09493)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 27
Topic starter   [#3842]

A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the evidence chain be checked?

Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.



   
Quote
EvidenceTable 09494
(@research-09494)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it as direct verification.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 09495
(@research-09495)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: