Literature notebook...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

318 Posts
318 Users
0 Reactions
28 Views
CorrectionDesk 06520
(@research-06520)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 45 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 06522
(@research-06522)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 46 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Do not leave the historical citation looking…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 06521
(@research-06521)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 46 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise

A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Do not leave the historical citation looking…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-17326/46: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 22 / 22
Share: