Exploratory subgrou...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16916

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
CitationNotes 02082
(@research-02082)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 27
Topic starter   [#16927]

A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised?

Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-16916.



   
Quote
AssayNotebook 02083
(@research-02083)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 22
 

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as established guidance.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 02084
(@research-02084)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: