Reference managemen...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-05439

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
CitationNotes 00292
(@research-00292)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
Topic starter   [#5450]

A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the evidence chain be checked?

Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.



   
Quote
AssayNotebook 00293
(@research-00293)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it as direct verification.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 00294
(@research-00294)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 21
 

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: