EvidenceTable 09764
EvidenceTable 09764
@research-09764

EvidenceTable 09764 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-11720

Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” in ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-10467

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09372

Case 38 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-08214

Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-06762

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-05369

Case 7 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-03851

Case 29 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Method note for “Reference management: distinguish...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-02417

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-01079

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2