EvidenceTable 09594
EvidenceTable 09594
@research-09594

EvidenceTable 09594 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-16476

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” is an...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-15375

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Record when only a secondary account was acc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-14278

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11716

Case 19 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10445

Case 26 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09372

Case 13 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answe...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-06757

Case 37 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: whi...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-05346

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-03851

Case 5 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the ev...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-02416

Case 32 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the p...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-01034

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2