CorrectionDesk 09540 · Member profile
Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Case 12 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. R...
Case 18 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...
Case 6 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations...
Case 30 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point...
Case 33 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Case 24 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sou...
Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer addresses “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outco...